Skip to main content

Table 4 Efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells in clinical outcomes

From: Immunomodulatory effects of mesenchymal stem cell therapy in chronic kidney disease: a literature review

Trials

Renal function

Immune function & others

LN

Sun et al., 2010 [23]

PRO: declined 58% at 3 mo (1.3 ± 0.9 vs 3.1 ± 1.2 g at BV)

SCr: improved 43% at 3 mo (2.3 ± 1.1 vs 4.0 ± 2.2 mg/dl at BV)

BUN: 6 (40%) patients improved at 3 mo

Tregs,C3,TGF-β ↑ IL-4 ↓ IFN-γ,IL-10 ↑↓ALB ↑

Liang et al., 2010 [24]

PRO: declined 64% at 1 yr (0.9 ± 0.8 vs 2.5 ± 1.3 g at BV)

SCr: 4 (27%) patients improved within 3 mo

GFR: 2 (13%) patients improved at 18 mo (45.5 vs 32.5 ml/min at BV) and 6 mo (49 vs 24 ml/min at BV), respectively

Tregs ↑

El-Ansary et al., 2012 [25]

SCr: a lower decrease at 6 mo (0.9 ± 0.3 vs 1.5 ± 0.5 mg/dl in controls)

GFR: improved 41% at 6 mo (72.3 ± 25.1 vs 43.0 ± 17.6 ml/min in controls)

Hb ↑↓

Wang et al., 2013 [26]

PRO: declined 44% decline at 6 mo (1.5 ± 1.0 vs 2.7 ± 1.2 g at BV)

SCr: declined 13% decline at 1 yr (2.0 [0.3] vs 2.3 [0.2] mg/dl at BV)

BUN: declined 36% decline at 1 yr (11.7 [0.9] vs 18.3 [1.7] mmol/l at BV)

GFR: improved 23% at 1 yr (63.4 ± 26.2 vs 51.5 ± 21.5 ml/min at BV)

C3 ↑ ALB, PLT, Hb ↑

Wang et al., 2014 [27]

PRO: declined 36% decline at 1 yr (1.4 ± 1.3 vs 2.2 ± 1.4 g at BV)

SCr: a significant decline at 6 mo

BUN: a significant decline at 6 and 9 mo

C3 ↑ ALB ↑

Gu et al., 2014 [28]

PRO: declined 44% at 1 yr (1.5 ± 1.0 vs 2.7 ± 1.2 g at BV)

SCr: declined 18% at 1 yr (1.8 ± 1.1 vs 2.2 ± 1.1 mg/dl at BV)

BUN: declined 36% at 1 yr (11.7 ± 4.7 vs 18.3 ± 9.5 mmol/l at BV)

GFR: improved 19% at 1 yr (69.5 ± 27.9 vs 58.6 ± 19.2 ml/min at BV)

ALB ↑

Deng et al., 2017 [30]

PRO, SCr and GFR: no significant change in both arms during 6 mo

C3, C4 ↑↓ ALB ↑↓

Barbado et al., 2018 [33]

PRO: all patients substantially improved at 1 w

SCr: 2 (67%) patients improved and another one kept at 9 mo

GFR: 1 (33%) patient improved at 3 m and the other 2 (67%) kept at 9 mo

Tregs, C4 ↑↓

Yuan et al., 2019 [35]

PRO: improved 68% at 6 mo (2.1 ± 3.4 vs 6.6 ± 4.1 g at BV)

SCr and BUN: no significant change during 6 mo

DCs,FLT3L ↑ TNF-α ↓ IL-10 ↑↓

Ranjbar et al., 2022 [36]

PRO: most substantially improved at 1mo (1.0 [0.3 to 2.5] vs 1.8 [1.0 to 5.3] g at BV)

GFR: improved 46% at 3 mo (86.9 [50.2 to 107.4] vs 59.4 [38.3 to 83.0] ml/min/1.73m2 at BV)

C3, C4 ↑↓

DN

Packham et al., 2016 [29]

PRO and GFR: no significant change during 6 mo

IL-6 ↓ TNF-α,TGF-β↑↓ HbA1c ↑↓

Perico et al., 2023 [38]

GFR: improved significantly at 12 and 18 mo (35.0 ± 8.9 vs 23.2 ± 4.3 ml/min/1.73m2 in placebo)

PRO: no significant change during 18 mo (1.0 [0.4 to 1.3] vs 0.7 [0.3 to 3.2] g in placebo)

Tregs ↑ NKT cells↓ T cells ↑↓ HbA1c ↑↓

IN

Saad et al., 2017 [31]

SCr: a transient increase in 1 w

GFR: a significant improvement at 3 mo

VEGF ↓ Cortical Perfusion, RBF ↑ Hypoxia ↓

CKDu

Carstens et al., 2023 [40]

GFR: a 25% improvement for stage 3a, 11% for 3b, −29% for 4 and −46% for 5 at 36 mo

Renal Volume ↑ RRI ↓

ADPKD

Makhlough et al., 2017 [32]

SCr and GFR: no significant change at 12 mo

Kidney Size↑↓

NS

Vivarelli et al., 2023 [39]

SCr, BUN, PRO and GFR: no significant change at 12 mo

B cells↓ Treg cells ↑ IgG,IgA,IgM,IL-10 ↑↓

Muti-etiology

Makhlough et al., 2018 [34]

SCr, BUN, PRO and GFR: no significant change

ALB ↑↓

  1. LN Lupus nephritis, DN Diabetic nephropathy, IN Ischemic nephropathy, CKDu Chronic kidney disease of unknown cause or mesoamerican nephropathy, ADPKD Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, NS Nephrotic syndrome, PRO Urinary protein, GFR Glomerular filtration rate, SCr Serum creatinine, BUN Blood urea nitrogen, ALB Serum albumin, CYS-C Cystatin-C, TG Triglyceride, C3 Complement C3, C4 Complement C4, Tregs Regulatory T cells, DCs Dendritic cells, Hb Hemoglobin, PLT Platelet, TGF-β Transforming growth factor-β, IFN-γ Interferon-γ, TNF-α Tumor necrosis factor-α, VEGF Vascular endothelial growth factor, RBF Renal blood flow, RRI Renal resistive index
  2. a. Values presented as mean ± standard deviation, mean [standard error of the mean], median [range, min to max]
  3. b. The change in renal function parameters is presented as a percentage by mean or median. Immune function and others are shown by ↑ (increase), ↓ (decrease), or ↑↓ (no significant change)